Unit Trust vs ETF in Malaysia: The Fees Your Agent Never Showed You
In September 2026, the Federation of Investment Managers Malaysia (FIMM) publicly reprimanded a former unit trust consultant from one of the country's biggest banks. Among the findings: he did not clearly explain the features and sales charges of a fixed deposit bundled with an ASNB sukuk investment to two investors, and he forged their signatures. He was barred from registering with FIMM for three years.
Most agents never do anything like that. Most are decent people doing a job. But that case points to a quiet truth about the unit trust vs ETF question in Malaysia: the costs are rarely the part of the conversation where anyone slows down.
So here is the short answer, before we go any further. (This article is general education, not personal financial advice.)
The short answer A typical equity unit trust bought through an agent in Malaysia can cost you up to 5.5% the day you invest (plus 8% SST on that charge), then around 1.5% to 1.9% every single year. A low-cost index ETF usually costs a small brokerage fee to buy and about 0.07% to 0.55% a year to hold. On RM100,000 over 20 years, at the same 7% market return, that gap can be worth more than RM100,000. Unit trusts can still make sense in some cases (EPF i-Invest is one). But you should know the price before you pay it. |
In this article
What you are actually comparing
A unit trust and an ETF are both baskets. You put money in, and the fund spreads it across many shares or bonds so one bad company cannot sink you.
The difference is in how the basket is run, how you buy it, and above all what it costs.
Unit trust (typical equity fund via agent) | Index ETF | |
How it is run | A manager picks investments, trying to beat the market | Simply copies an index, like the FBM KLCI or the S&P 500 |
How you buy it | Through an agent, bank or online platform, at the day's closing price | On a stock exchange through a broker, at live prices during the day |
Upfront cost | Sales charge, often up to 5.5% of NAV, plus 8% SST on that charge | Brokerage and a 0.03% clearing fee on Bursa |
Yearly cost | Management fee around 1.5% to 1.8%, plus trustee fee | About 0.07% to 0.55% for most index ETFs |
Minimum | Often RM1,000 to start | One board lot (100 units on Bursa), or one share overseas |
Who earns from the sale | Part of the sales charge pays the person who sold it to you | No sales commission is built into the price; you pay your broker a trading fee instead |
Look at that last row again. It explains a great deal about why you have probably heard far more about unit trusts than about ETFs.
Malaysia has more than 59,000 registered unit trust consultants, according to FIMM's own statistics as at September 2026. There is no equivalent sales army for index ETFs. An ETF has nobody knocking on your door, because nobody gets paid to knock.
That does not make unit trusts bad. It means the product you hear about most is not always the product that costs you least.
Hidden fee No. 1: the sales charge, and the new tax on top of it
The sales charge is the entry fee. You pay it every time you put money in.
For equity unit trusts in Malaysia it is commonly up to 5.5% of the net asset value (NAV). One large Malaysian fund house's equity fund page, for example, lists a sales charge of "up to 5.50%" and an annual management fee of up to 1.80%. Many prospectuses quietly add that you may negotiate a lower sales charge. Few investors ever ask.
An iFAST research analyst once told Focus Malaysia that a sales charge as high as 5.5% put Malaysian fund houses among the most expensive in the region, while upfront charges in neighbouring Singapore were close to zero for most funds.
The 8% tax most investors missed
Since 1 October 2025, unit trust services in Malaysia have been subject to 8% Sales and Service Tax (SST), and fund houses have confirmed it applies to sales charges.
Eastspring gives a clean example: invest RM5,000 into a fund with a 5% sales charge, and RM18.98 of SST is added, so only RM4,743.83 is actually invested. The SST is small. The point is that it sits on top of a charge that was already large.
What it does to RM100,000
Here is the same maths on a bigger cheque, with a 5.5% sales charge and 8% SST.
Amount | |
You hand over | RM100,000 |
Sales charge plus SST | about RM5,607 |
Actually invested on day one | about RM94,393 |
Gain needed just to break even | about 5.9% |
Read that last line slowly. Your fund has to rise almost 6% before you are back to the money you started with. In a calm year for markets, that can take a year or more.
And that is before the yearly fee.
Hidden fee No. 2: the yearly fee you never see deducted
The annual management fee is the one most investors never notice, because it never shows up as a bill.
It is taken out of the fund's assets bit by bit, every day. The NAV you see is already after the fee. So you never feel it leave. You simply end up with less.
For actively managed equity unit trusts in Malaysia, management fees of around 1.5% to 1.8% a year are common, plus a small trustee fee (often around 0.05% to 0.08%) and other fund expenses. Some funds charge more.
Now compare that with index ETFs:
The FTSE4Good Bursa Malaysia etf (formerly the FBM KLCI etf), one of Bursa's longest-running index ETFs, charges a 0.50% management fee and a 0.05% trustee fee.
The iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSPX), an Ireland-domiciled fund many Malaysians use for US exposure, has a total expense ratio of 0.07% a year.
A 1.85% fee does not sound like much. But it is charged on your whole balance, every year, for as long as you stay. On RM94,393 invested and growing at 7% a year, it is roughly RM1,900 in the first year, and it grows as your money grows.
On RM100,000 in year one, the unit trust bought through an agent costs roughly RM7,500 once the sales charge, SST and the first year's management and trustee fees are added up. The Ireland-domiciled S&P 500 ETF costs roughly RM450, including brokerage, its expense ratio and dividend tax drag.
If you want to see this with your own numbers, put them into my free Hidden Fee Calculator. It shows what a 1.5% to 2% fee takes from your savings over 10, 20 or 30 years.
Hidden fee No. 3: switching and churning
Here is a cost that never appears in any fee table: being moved around.
Every time money is redeemed from one fund and put into another with a new sales charge, the clock resets. You pay the entry fee again (and now the SST on it), and you have to climb back above water again.
Malaysian rules prohibit this when it is done to earn commission. FIMM's code bans "churning", which it describes as excessive redemptions and purchases using the same investment money, and it bans switching done to generate sales commission or that is not in the investor's best interest.
The rules exist because it happens. In 2021, FIMM publicly reprimanded a former consultant of Principal Asset Management for redeeming, switching and buying unit trusts with the same investor money for the purpose of generating commission. Other FIMM reprimands over the years have involved unauthorised switching, unauthorised redemptions and even forged signatures on switching and redemption forms.
Again, most agents do not do this. But you should know the warning sign: if someone suggests you "rotate into a better fund" every year or two, ask what it will cost you in sales charges, and ask whether a free switch is available within the same fund house.
Warning sign "Let's switch you into this newer fund" is not advice until someone tells you the exact sales charge, any switching fee, the SST, and why the new fund is worth paying all of it again. |
Hidden fee No. 4: the fund inside the fund
Many Malaysian unit trusts that invest overseas are "feeder funds". Your ringgit goes into a local fund, and that local fund puts nearly all of it into one foreign fund.
That structure is not wrong. But it can stack costs. The Malaysian fund has its own management fee, and the foreign "target" fund has its own expenses too. The prospectus will explain how the two layers work, and whether any fee is rebated. Most people never read that page.
If you want US or global shares, compare the full cost of the feeder fund with simply buying a low-cost index ETF that holds the same market directly. I compare the two main S&P 500 ETF choices in CSPX vs VOO: which S&P 500 ETF should you buy if you don't live in the US.
What an ETF really costs a Malaysian investor
It would be dishonest to say ETFs are free. They are not. Here is the full list, so you can compare fairly.
Buying an ETF on Bursa Malaysia
Brokerage: set by your broker. Many online brokers charge a small percentage with a minimum fee per trade, so compare before you open an account.
Clearing fee: 0.03% of the trade value, capped at RM1,000 per contract.
Stamp duty: Bursa-listed ETFs are currently exempt from stamp duty (Rakuten Trade states the exemption runs until 2028). Ordinary shares pay 0.1%, capped at RM1,000. Check your broker's current fee page, because exemptions have end dates.
Yearly fee: for the FTSE4Good Bursa Malaysia etf, a 0.50% management fee plus a 0.05% trustee fee.
Buying an S&P 500 ETF listed overseas
Brokerage and currency conversion: you will pay a trading fee and a spread or fee to change ringgit into US dollars.
Yearly fee: as low as 0.03% (VOO) to 0.07% (CSPX).
Dividend withholding tax: this is the one that catches Malaysians. Malaysia has no tax treaty with the US, so dividends from US-domiciled ETFs like VOO are taxed 30% before they reach you. An Ireland-domiciled ETF like CSPX pays 15% at the fund level, because of the US-Ireland treaty. I explain the legal way to cut this in The 30% Dividend Tax You Didn't Know You Pay on US Stocks.
With an S&P 500 dividend yield of around 1.2% to 1.3%, a 15% withholding tax works out to roughly 0.2% a year. Add the 0.07% expense ratio and the all-in yearly drag is around 0.3%. That is the figure I use below, to be fair to the unit trust.
The small-amount trap If you invest only RM300 or RM500 a month, a minimum brokerage fee of around RM7 or RM8 per trade can eat about 1.4% to 2.7% of each purchase. Fix it by investing every two or three months instead, or by using a broker or regular savings plan with low or zero commission on small amounts. |
For a full walk-through of brokers, fees and taxes, see How to Invest in the S&P 500 From Malaysia: Brokers, Fees and Taxes, Step by Step.
The 20-year ringgit showdown
Now the part your agent's brochure does not have.
I gave three investors RM100,000 each and assumed the exact same market return for all of them: 7% a year before costs, for 20 years. The only difference between them is what they pay.
Investor A buys an equity unit trust through an agent: 5.5% sales charge plus 8% SST, then 1.85% a year.
Investor B buys a Malaysian index ETF on Bursa: about 0.13% to buy, then 0.55% a year.
Investor C buys an Ireland-domiciled S&P 500 ETF: about 0.13% to buy, then about 0.3% a year all-in.
Year | Unit trust via agent | Bursa index ETF | Ireland S&P 500 ETF |
Day one | RM94,393 | RM99,870 | RM99,870 |
Year 5 | RM120,590 | RM136,263 | RM137,984 |
Year 10 | RM154,057 | RM185,918 | RM190,645 |
Year 15 | RM196,812 | RM253,667 | RM263,402 |
Year 20 | RM251,433 | RM346,104 | RM363,927 |
After 20 years, Investor C has about RM112,000 more than Investor A. Investor B has about RM95,000 more. Same market. Same luck. Different fees.
With no costs at all, RM100,000 at 7% a year would have become about RM386,968. Investor A ends up roughly RM135,500 short of that. Investor C ends up roughly RM23,000 short. The difference is not skill. It is arithmetic.
What if you invest RM500 a month instead?
Most people do not have RM100,000 on day one. So here is the same test with RM500 a month for 20 years (RM120,000 invested in total), again at 7% a year before costs.
Value after 20 years | |
Unit trust via agent (5.5% + SST, 1.85% a year) | about RM192,700 |
Bursa index ETF (0.55% a year) | about RM238,400 |
Ireland S&P 500 ETF (about 0.3% a year) | about RM245,700 |
That is a gap of roughly RM53,000 between the unit trust and the low-cost S&P 500 ETF, on the same RM500 a month.
Fair warning about these numbers These are illustrations, not forecasts. Real returns go up and down, and a Malaysian fund and an S&P 500 fund will not earn the same return. I used one return for everyone on purpose, so the only thing that changes is cost. The ETF figures assume reasonable brokerage; small, frequent purchases with a high minimum fee would cost more. |
"But my fund beats the index"
This is the strongest argument for a unit trust, so let us take it seriously.
An active fund charges more because it promises to earn more than the index. If it truly does, after all fees, the higher price could be worth paying. The question is how often that happens.
What the biggest scorecard says
S&P Dow Jones Indices publishes the SPIVA scorecard, which compares active funds with their benchmark after fees. Its largest and most watched comparison is US large-cap funds against the S&P 500.
In its latest full-year report, for 2025 alone, 79% of active US large-cap funds trailed the S&P 500. Over longer periods it gets worse: about 85.6% trailed over 10 years, about 89.9% over 15 years, and about 92.9% over 20 years ending December 2025.
S&P does not publish a SPIVA scorecard for Malaysia, so I will not pretend these figures describe Malaysian unit trusts. But the same force is at work everywhere: costs come out every year whether the manager does well or not. I go deeper into this in Stock Picking vs. the S&P 500: What 20 Years of Results Say About Who Actually Wins.
What Malaysian research found
To be fair, there is local evidence that points the other way, at least over shorter periods. A study led by a Universiti Utara Malaysia researcher, published in 2025, compared one Malaysian ETF with three comparable unit trust funds over three and five years, using the FBM KLCI as the benchmark, and found the unit trusts did better on a risk-adjusted basis in that period.
That is a small sample and a short window. But it is a reminder that some managers do add value, especially against a benchmark of just 30 large stocks, where a skilled manager has room to avoid the weak ones. The hard part is picking that manager in advance, and staying with them for 20 years.
The bet that settled it for many investors
In 2007, Warren Buffett bet US$1 million that a simple S&P 500 index fund would beat a hand-picked group of hedge funds over ten years. The hedge funds were run by some of the best-paid managers in the world.
Over the ten years to 2017, the index fund compounded at about 8.5% a year. The five funds of hedge funds managed between roughly 0.3% and 6.5% a year. Buffett's winnings went to Girls Inc. of Omaha. His point was never that managers are stupid. It was that high fees are a very heavy backpack to carry up a long hill. Read the full story in How a Boring Index Fund Beat Five Teams of Wall Street's Highest-Paid Money Managers.
When a unit trust still makes sense
I do not want you to walk away thinking every unit trust is a trap. That would not be true, and it would not help you. Here is where a unit trust can be the sensible choice.
1. You are investing EPF money through i-Invest
Under the EPF Members Investment Scheme, members below 55 can move part of their retirement savings (up to 30% of the amount above Basic Savings) into EPF-approved unit trusts. EPF caps the sales charge at 0.5% through its online i-Invest channel, compared with up to 3% through agents.
You cannot buy a Bursa ETF with EPF money under this scheme, so for that slice of your savings, a low-cost, low-charge unit trust bought on i-Invest is often the realistic choice. Pay attention to the yearly management fee, though, because the 0.5% cap only covers the entry charge.
2. You know you will not invest on your own
A cheap ETF you never buy earns nothing. If a monthly auto-debit into a unit trust is the only way you will actually save, that habit can be worth more than the fee difference. Just make sure you buy through the lowest-cost channel available.
3. You buy online, not through an agent
The same fund can cost far less depending on where you buy it. Online platforms in Malaysia have long offered much lower sales charges than agents, sometimes zero on selected funds. Some charge a small yearly platform fee instead, so compare both numbers.
4. You want something an ETF does not offer
Malaysia's ETF shelf is still small. The Securities Commission listed 13 Bursa ETFs as at 31 May 2026. If you need a particular Shariah-compliant mix, a bond fund or a money market fund, a unit trust may be the practical tool.
A simple test A unit trust has to earn its fee. If you cannot explain, in one sentence, what you are getting for the extra 1% to 1.5% a year, you are probably paying for a sales process, not for results. |
Which one should you choose?
Follow the arrows from the top. If you end up at "low-cost index ETF", the next question is which one. For most long-term investors outside the US, a broad, low-cost index fund is the simplest core. My Lazy 3-Fund Portfolio guide shows how to build one without watching the news.
7 questions to ask your agent before you sign
Print this list or save it on your phone. A good agent will answer every question without hesitation.
What is the exact sales charge on this purchase, in ringgit, including SST?
Can the sales charge be lowered? The prospectus may say it is negotiable.
What is the annual management fee, the trustee fee, and the fund's total expense ratio last year?
Is this a feeder fund? If so, what does the target fund charge on top?
How has this fund done against its own benchmark over 5 and 10 years, after fees?
How much commission do you earn on this sale, and on any future switch?
Is there a cheaper way to buy this same fund, such as online or through EPF i-Invest?
If any answer is vague, pause. You can take the Product Highlights Sheet home and read it first. A cooling-off right also applies to many first-time unit trust purchases, so ask about that too.
What to do tonight
You do not need to sell everything tomorrow. Selling in a panic has its own cost. Here is a calm plan.
Find your statements. List every unit trust you own, the date you bought, and the amount.
Look up each fund's fees. The Product Highlights Sheet shows the sales charge and annual fees. Note the total expense ratio from the latest report.
Put the numbers into a calculator. Use the Hidden Fee Calculator to see what each fund's yearly fee will cost you over the next 20 years.
Compare before adding new money. Before your next top-up, compare the cost of a low-cost ETF, or the online channel for the same fund, with what you pay now.
Check before you switch. Moving existing money may trigger fees or a loss. Weigh the one-time cost against the yearly savings.
Keep it simple. One or two broad index funds beat a drawer full of overlapping unit trusts. See How Many Index Funds Should You Own?
Frequently asked questions
Is ETF better than unit trust in Malaysia?
For most long-term investors, a low-cost index ETF costs far less than an equity unit trust bought through an agent: no sales charge, and yearly fees of about 0.07% to 0.55% instead of around 1.5% to 1.9%. A unit trust can still suit EPF investing, very small automatic savings, or specific Shariah, bond or money market needs.
How much does a unit trust really cost in Malaysia?
An equity unit trust bought through an agent commonly carries a sales charge of up to 5.5% of NAV, plus 8% SST on that charge since October 2025. On top of that, expect an annual management fee of around 1.5% to 1.8%, a trustee fee and other fund expenses, deducted from the fund every year.
Can I negotiate the unit trust sales charge?
Often, yes. Many Malaysian fund prospectuses state the sales charge is "up to" a figure and that you may negotiate a lower rate. Online platforms and EPF i-Invest also offer much lower charges. Always ask for the exact ringgit amount, including SST, before you sign.
What is the sales charge for EPF i-Invest?
EPF caps the initial sales charge at 0.5% when you invest through its online i-Invest channel, compared with up to 3% through agents or counters. The cap covers only the entry fee. The fund's annual management fee still applies, so compare that too.
Do Malaysians pay tax on ETF dividends?
For most Malaysian individuals, the cost that bites is foreign withholding tax. US-domiciled ETFs such as VOO have 30% of dividends withheld because Malaysia has no tax treaty with the US. Ireland-domiciled ETFs such as CSPX suffer 15% inside the fund instead.
Is a unit trust safer than an ETF?
Not by itself. Both are regulated funds that hold assets on your behalf through a trustee or custodian. Safety depends on what the fund holds, not on the label. An equity unit trust and an equity ETF can both fall sharply in a crash. Higher fees do not buy you protection.
Should I sell my unit trusts and buy ETFs?
Not automatically. The sales charge you paid is already gone, so ask what the fund will cost from today. If its yearly fee is high and it has lagged its benchmark, moving may help. Check redemption or switching fees first. Many people simply direct new money to low-cost options.
The calm way forward
Fees are the one part of investing you can control. You cannot control the market, interest rates or the next crash. But you can decide, today, how much of your future returns you hand to someone else.
Paying 2% a year can be fine, if you are getting something real for it. Paying it because no one ever showed you the number is not.
Now you have the number.
Free report If you have lost money in the market before and want to understand why, download my free 38-page report, "Why You Lost Money in the Stock Market (And Why It Wasn't Your Fault)". It shows the hidden forces, fees included, that work against ordinary investors, and the simple plan that works instead. |
You may also like: Jack Bogle's 10 Rules for Investors Who Are Tired of Losing Money.
About the author
Stephen Loke has been a student of the market for more than 15 years. He is also an agritourism entrepreneur whose farm has been featured in Bloomberg News and Asahi Shimbun.
This article is general education, not personal financial advice. I am not a licensed financial adviser. Fees, tax rules and product details change, so check the latest prospectus, Product Highlights Sheet and broker fee schedule before you invest, and consider speaking with a licensed adviser about your own situation.
Sources
FIMM public reprimand of three former UTS/PRS consultants, reported by The Star / Bernama, 10 September 2026: https://www.thestar.com.my/business/business-news/2026/09/10/fimm-publicly-reprimands-three-former-uts-prs-consultants-for-misconduct
FIMM public reprimand (churning to generate commission), 2021: https://www.fimm.com.my/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Public-Reprimand-Press-Release-Zu-Final.pdf
FIMM public reprimand citing churning and switching rules, 17 October 2023: https://www.fimm.com.my/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/2023-10-17-FIMM-PRESS-RELEASE-PUBLIC-REPRIMAND-Stephanie-AP-Christopher-Ramesh.pdf
FIMM Quick Statistics (registered consultants, authorised funds), September 2026: https://www.fimm.com.my/industry/quick-statistic/
FIMM public reprimand (forged signature on a switching form), 24 April 2024: https://www.fimm.com.my/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/2024-04-24-FIMM-PRESS-RELEASE-PUBLIC-REPRIMAND.pdf
Kenanga Investors, EPF Members' Investment Scheme: https://www.kenangainvestors.com.my/epf-members-investment-scheme-why-should-you-invest
Eastspring Investments, SST expansion on unit trust investments (effective 1 October 2025): https://www.eastspring.com/my/announcement--sst-expansion-on-unit-trust-investments
AHAM Asset Management, example equity fund fee page (sales charge up to 5.50%, management fee up to 1.80%): https://aham.com.my/invest-with-us/list-of-funds/details?q=SJQFHCF
Focus Malaysia, "Alternative investments to high-cost unit trusts" (iFAST comment on 5.5% sales charge): https://focusmalaysia.my/alternative-investments-to-high-cost-unit-trusts/
AmInvest, FTSE4Good Bursa Malaysia etf (formerly FBM KLCI etf) fund information: https://www.aminvest.com/f4gbmetf/fund-information
New Straits Times, EPF revised list of approved funds (0.5% i-Invest sales charge cap), 2 April 2024: https://www.nst.com.my/amp/business/corporate/2024/04/1033331/epf-releases-revised-list-189-funds-approved-investment-members
Selangor Journal / Bernama, EPF MIS qualifying list and i-Invest charges: https://selangorjournal.my/?p=267297
The Edge Malaysia, EY on US withholding tax and Irish-domiciled ETFs, March 2026: https://theedgemalaysia.com/node/794725
StashAway Malaysia, ETFs vs index funds vs unit trusts vs robo-advisors (SC-listed Bursa ETFs, unit trust NAV): https://www.stashaway.my/r/etfs-vs-index-funds-vs-unit-trusts-vs-robo-advisors
Asia Asset Management, Malaysia unit trust industry NAV 2025, 12 June 2026: https://www.asiaasset.com/fixed-income/malaysias-unit-trust-industry-net-asset-value-up-6-37-bond-and-money-market-funds-lead/
Interactive Brokers, Malaysia stock exchange fees (clearing fee, ETF stamp duty): https://www.interactivebrokers.ie/en/accounts/fees/MALAYSIA-StkFees.php
Rakuten Trade, charges and fees FAQ: https://www.rakutentrade.my/faqs/charges-and-fees
StashAway Singapore, SPY vs VOO vs IVV vs CSPX (expense ratios): https://stashaway.sg/r/spy-voo-ivv-cspx-snp500-etf
S&P Dow Jones Indices, SPIVA U.S. Year-End 2025 Scorecard: https://www.spglobal.com/spdji/en/documents/spiva/spiva-us-year-end-2025.pdf
Next Gen Personal Finance, summary of SPIVA U.S. Year-End 2025 long-term figures: https://www.ngpf.org/blog/question-of-the-day/question-of-the-day-over-a-recent-20-year-period-what-percent-of-pros-investing-in-large-companies-beat-the-market/
Nordin and Zainuddin, "Comparative performance analysis of ETFs and unit trust funds: a Malaysian case", Practitioner Research, 2025: https://e-journal.uum.edu.my/index.php/pr/article/view/29239
Conversable Economist, "Index funds vs hedge funds: Buffett's bet, 10 years later" (final results), 2018: https://conversableeconomist.com/2018/05/07/index-funds-vs-hedge-funds-buffetts-bet-10-years-later/
D&O Diary, a closer look at Buffett's 2017 letter, 2018: https://www.dandodiary.com/2018/02/articles/warren-buffett/closer-look-warren-buffetts-latest-letter-berkshire-shareholders/
Institutional Investor, "Protégé Partners pays up in Buffett bet": https://www.institutionalinvestor.com/article/2bsxg3kg83vmbpufwighs/culture/protege-partners-pays-up-in-buffett-bet
CNBC, Buffett wins bet against hedge funds: https://www.cnbc.com/id/104926483
Comments