7 Signs You're Gambling in the Stock Market, Not Investing
Picture two neighbors on New Year's Day 2024. Both are in their fifties. Both have $100,000 they want to grow for retirement. Both put it into the same stock market on the same morning.
The first neighbor buys an S&P 500 index fund, sets up a small monthly top-up, and goes back to his life. He checks the balance a few times that year. He doesn't do much else.
The second neighbor is "active." She reads the headlines every morning. She sells in April when the news turns ugly, buys back in when things feel safer, adds a hot AI stock a friend swears by, and dumps a laggard to "stop the bleeding." By December she has made dozens of decisions, and every single one felt smart at the time.
Who finished ahead?
You already know. And the real-world numbers are brutal. According to DALBAR's long-running study of investor behavior, the S&P 500 returned 25.02% in 2024, but the average equity fund investor earned only 16.54%. On $100,000, that is the difference between ending the year with $125,020 and ending it with $112,774. Same market. Same year. More than $12,000 gone, not to a crash, but to behavior.
Here is the uncomfortable truth that five decades of market history keep teaching, from the 1987 crash to the dot-com bust, 2008, the 2020 panic and the meme-stock mania: most people who lose money in the stock market were never really investing. They were gambling, with better graphics.
The stock market can be the greatest wealth-building machine ordinary people have ever had. It can also be the most expensive casino on earth. The difference isn't the market. It's how you play it.
This article gives you the 7 warning signs, the research behind each one, a 2-minute self-test, and a simple reset plan to move from the casino floor to the owner's side of the table.
Key takeaways Investing means owning productive businesses for years, on a plan, at low cost. Gambling means betting on short-term price moves where the math works against most players. In one landmark study of 66,465 households, the most active traders earned 11.4% a year while the market earned 17.9%. 97% of Brazilian day traders who persisted for more than 300 days lost money. Fewer than 1% of Taiwanese day traders could reliably profit. Missing just the 10 best days of the last 20 years cut a $10,000 investment's ending value by more than half. Over 20 years, 92.9% of professional large-cap fund managers trailed the S&P 500. The simplest strategy beat the experts. |
Investing vs. Gambling: The Difference in One Sentence
Investing is owning a share of productive businesses for long enough that their profits, not your predictions, do the work. Gambling is betting money on a short-term outcome where, after costs, the odds favor the house.
That's it. Notice what the definition does not depend on. It doesn't depend on whether you buy stocks, funds or options. It doesn't depend on how much research you think you did. A person can gamble with blue-chip shares, and a person can invest with a single, boring index fund.
The difference lives in three places: your time horizon, your expected return after costs, and whether a plan or a feeling is making the decisions.
When you own a broad slice of the market, you own part of the profits of hundreds of real companies that sell real products to real customers. Over time, those profits grow, dividends get paid, and the value compounds. The S&P 500 has delivered roughly 10% a year over the long run, and no rolling 20-year period in its history has ended with a loss.
When you bet on next week's price, none of that matters. You are no longer collecting the profits of businesses. You are trying to outguess millions of other people, many of them professionals with faster computers, cheaper trades and better information. Every trade costs something. The house always collects.
The gambler | The investor |
|---|---|
Trades often, holds for days or weeks | Buys and holds for years |
Buys tips, stories and hot tickers | Owns businesses, or the whole market |
Hunts for the jackpot: penny stocks, meme stocks, options | Wants the reliable, average market return |
Uses margin, leverage or money needed for bills | Invests only money that can stay put for 5+ years |
Jumps in and out on headlines and feelings | Follows a written plan, rebalances on a schedule |
Chases losses to "get back to even" | Accepts losses, learns, sticks to the plan |
Believes he has an edge | Assumes he doesn't, and keeps costs low |
Now let's go through the seven signs one by one. Be honest with yourself as you read. Most people recognize at least one.
Sign 1: You're Renting Stocks, Not Owning Businesses
The first sign is the simplest to measure: how long do you hold what you buy?
If your holding periods are measured in days or weeks, you are not owning anything. You are renting price movements. And the research on renting is devastating.
In one of the most famous studies in finance, professors Brad Barber and Terrance Odean examined the trading records of 66,465 households at a large U.S. discount broker from 1991 to 1996. They sorted the households by how much they traded.
The result? The households that traded the most earned a net return of 11.4% a year. The market returned 17.9%. The households that traded the least earned 18.5%. The researchers' conclusion became the title of their paper: trading is hazardous to your wealth.
Think about what that gap means in real money. At 18.5% a year, $100,000 becomes about $546,000 in ten years. At 11.4%, it becomes about $294,000. The difference, roughly a quarter of a million dollars, came from activity. Not from picking worse companies. The researchers found it was mostly the cost and frequency of trading, not the stocks themselves, that explained the poor results.
Day trading takes this to its logical extreme, and the results look like a slot machine's payout table.
A team of Brazilian economists followed every individual who started day trading the Brazilian stock index futures market between 2013 and 2015. Of the 1,551 people who stuck with it for more than 300 trading days, 97% lost money. Only 1.1% earned more than Brazil's minimum wage, about US$16 a day. The single best performer averaged about US$310 a day, with enormous daily swings.
Taiwan tells the same story with an even bigger sample. Researchers who studied the entire Taiwan Stock Exchange from 1992 to 2006 found that fewer than 1% of day traders could predictably and reliably earn positive returns after fees.
Quick check: Look at your last 20 purchases. How many did you still own six months later? If the answer is fewer than half, you're renting, not owning. |
Here's the part most people miss. Even the "average investor" isn't immune. DALBAR found that in 2024, the average holding period for an equity fund had dropped to just 4.79 years. When people get bored, scared or excited, they move money. And every move is a fresh chance to be wrong.
Sign 2: You Buy Stories, Tips and Tickers
Ask yourself this about any stock you own: could you explain, in two sentences, how this company makes money and why it will make more in five years?
If the honest answer is "a guy on YouTube said it's going to the moon," or "it was trending," or "my brother-in-law made 40% on it," you've bought a story, not a business.
This isn't a character flaw. It's how human attention works. Barber and Odean showed years ago that individual investors are net buyers of attention-grabbing stocks: the ones in the news, the ones with unusual trading volume, the ones that jumped the day before. Professionals know this. They often take the other side.
A more recent study put modern trading apps under the microscope. Researchers analyzed "herding events" on Robinhood, days when large numbers of the app's users piled into the same stock at once. On the day of a herding event, those stocks jumped about 14% on average, and about 42% in the most extreme cases. Then the hangover arrived. Over the following month, the most popular stocks bought by the crowd fell about 5%, and the extreme cases gave back about 9%. The crowd bought the spike and held the drop.
The most famous herding event of all made headlines in January 2021. GameStop shares rocketed as a frenzy spread through online forums, minting a handful of overnight fortunes. On the day brokers restricted new purchases, the stock fell 44%. For every legend who sold near the top, many more bought in near it.
The two-sentence test Before you buy anything, write two sentences: (1) how this business makes money, and (2) why that money should grow over the next five years. If you can't write them, you're not ready to buy. If you're buying an index fund, your two sentences are easy: "I own a slice of the 500 largest U.S. companies. Their combined profits have grown for a century, and I'm not trying to guess which ones win." |
Notice what the index fund sentence admits: I don't know which companies will win. That humility is not weakness. As you'll see in Sign 7, it's the single most profitable admission in investing.
Sign 3: You're Chasing the Jackpot
Walk into any casino and look at where the crowds are. They aren't at the tables with the best odds. They're at the slot machines with the biggest, flashiest jackpots.
The stock market has its own slot machines: penny stocks, meme stocks, tiny biotech stocks waiting on one drug trial, and short-dated options. They share one feature. They offer a small chance of a huge payoff, and they charge for it.
Finance professor Alok Kumar studied the trading records of about 70,000 individual investors and identified what he called "lottery-type stocks": cheap shares, typically under $5, with wild price swings and the occasional spectacular jump. His findings, published in the Journal of Finance, were striking. The same kinds of people who spend more on state lotteries also invest more in lottery-type stocks. Demand for these stocks rises during economic downturns, just like lottery ticket sales. And investors who leaned into them typically earned 2 to 3 percent less than other investors.
Why do lottery stocks lose? Because most individual stocks lose. That sounds wrong, but it's one of the most important facts in all of investing.
Professor Hendrik Bessembinder studied the lifetime returns of nearly 26,000 U.S. stocks from 1926 to 2016. He found that 57.4% of them did worse than one-month Treasury bills over their lifetimes. Just 4.3% of stocks, about 1,092 companies, created all of the stock market's net wealth above Treasury bills.
Read that again. The stock market as a whole is a wonderful investment. But the typical individual stock is a losing ticket. The market's long-term return comes from a small number of extraordinary winners, and nobody can reliably pick them in advance. Bet on a handful of stocks hoping for the next superstar, and the odds say you'll mostly end up holding the other 96%.
Options are where the jackpot hunt becomes most expensive. A study by economists at the London Business School estimated that retail investors lost about $1.14 billion trading options between November 2019 and June 2021, and paid another $4.13 billion in trading costs on top. The researchers noted that the contracts small traders favor have lottery-like features.
Then came zero-day options, contracts that expire the same day they're bought. One study found that since daily expirations were introduced, retail traders lost about $358,000 a day on these S&P 500 options. If you have been burned this way, my guide on what to do in the first 30 days after losing your savings trading options walks you through a calm recovery plan.
The jackpot trap in one line: You don't need a 10-bagger to get rich. A 10% average annual return turns $100,000 into about $1.74 million in 30 years. The investor who wants "average" usually ends up far richer than the gambler who wants "spectacular." |
Sign 4: You're Betting Money That Isn't Yours (Or That You Can't Afford to Lose)
Every gambler knows the rule, and almost every gambler breaks it: never bet the rent.
In the stock market, "betting the rent" takes two forms. The first is investing money you will need soon: next year's tuition, the house deposit, the emergency fund. The second is borrowing to bet bigger: margin loans, leveraged ETFs, contracts for difference (CFDs) and similar products.
Leverage is seductive because it multiplies your gains. It is deadly because it multiplies your losses at exactly the same rate, and it adds a feature the casino would love: a forced exit at the worst possible moment.
If the market falls... | No leverage | 2x leverage | 4x leverage |
|---|---|---|---|
10% | You're down 10% | You're down 20% | You're down 40% |
25% | You're down 25% | You're down 50% | You're wiped out |
50% | You're down 50% | You're wiped out | Wiped out long before |
And remember how recovery math works. A 50% loss needs a 100% gain just to get back to even. I've written a full breakdown of how long it takes to recover from a 50% stock market loss, and the short version is: years, sometimes many of them. With leverage, you may not get those years, because the broker sells you out first.
If you think leverage only hurts amateurs, consider Long-Term Capital Management. In 1998, this hedge fund was run by some of the most celebrated minds in finance, including two Nobel Prize winners. It borrowed heavily, at times more than 25 dollars for every dollar of its own capital. When markets moved against it, the fund lost about $4.6 billion in less than four months, and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York had to organize a $3.6 billion rescue by major banks to prevent wider damage. Genius plus leverage still equals a gamble.
It isn't new, either. In 1720, Sir Isaac Newton, one of the greatest scientific minds in history, reportedly lost around £20,000 in the South Sea Bubble after buying back in near the peak. Brilliance does not protect anyone from a crowd, a bubble and borrowed confidence.
European regulators studied ordinary leveraged traders closely. When the European Securities and Markets Authority restricted CFDs in 2018, it reported that 74% to 89% of retail accounts typically lose money on these products, with average losses per client ranging from about €1,600 to €29,000.
There's also a quieter way gambling eats investment money. When U.S. states legalized online sports betting, researchers found that households' net investment into brokerage accounts fell by nearly 14%. Money that could have been compounding for retirement went to the betting apps instead. The urge to gamble and the urge to invest compete for the same dollars.
The sleep test: Only invest money that you won't need for at least five years, and that you could watch fall 30% without losing sleep or selling. If a drop would force you to sell, you aren't investing that money. You're betting it. |
If any of this already happened to you, don't panic and don't hide it. Read Can't Sleep After a Big Stock Loss? 9 Things to Do Before You Touch Your Portfolio Again before you make your next move. And if you want the bigger picture of why ordinary investors keep losing to the system, my free 38-page report lays out the seven Wall Street traps behind most losses.
Sign 5: You Jump In and Out on Headlines
"I'll just get out until things calm down."
It might be the most expensive sentence in investing. It feels responsible. It feels like risk management. But it's really a bet: a bet that you can predict both when to get out and when to get back in. You have to be right twice.
Look at what happened to investors who missed just a handful of the market's best days. J.P. Morgan Asset Management's analysis of the S&P 500 from January 2006 to December 2025 shows that $10,000 left alone grew to about $80,619, an 11.0% annual return. Miss just the 10 best days out of roughly 5,000 trading days, and the ending value drops to about $35,866. Miss the best 30 days and you're down to $13,826. Miss the best 60, and your $10,000 shrinks to $4,966.
Here's the cruel twist. The best days don't arrive when things feel calm. They arrive in the middle of the panic. According to J.P. Morgan, seven of the 10 best days in that period came within 15 days of one of the 10 worst days. The people who "got out until things calm down" were sitting in cash on exactly the days that mattered most.
The DALBAR data shows this pattern year after year. 2024's huge gap came largely from investors pulling money out and missing the rally. In 2025 the gap shrank to just 0.72 percentage points, the smallest since 2012, but DALBAR also recorded a record monthly withdrawal rate of 2.30% in July 2025. Even in a good year, the urge to bail was right there.
Morningstar's 2026 Mind the Gap study adds a revealing detail. Across nearly 23,000 U.S. funds and ETFs, investors earned about 8.7% a year over the decade to 2025, while the funds themselves returned about 9.9%. Bad timing cost investors around 12% of the total returns their funds delivered. But look at how that gap changes with the type of investment.
Investors in crypto ETFs, the most casino-like product in the study, lost about 14 percentage points to their own buying and selling over the year measured. Investors in plain U.S. stock index funds lost almost nothing: about 0.1 percentage points. The wilder the ride, the more people jump on and off at the wrong time. The boring option doesn't just perform well. It keeps you from sabotaging yourself.
Headline rule: If a news story makes you want to buy or sell today, write the trade down and wait 72 hours. If it still makes sense after three days and still fits your written plan, consider it. Most "urgent" trades quietly die in the waiting room, and that's the point. |
Sign 6: You Chase Your Losses
There is a phrase every casino manager loves to hear: "I just need to win it back."
In the stock market, it sounds like this: "I'll hold until it gets back to what I paid." Or: "I'll double down at this lower price." Or: "One good trade and I'm back to even."
Psychologists Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky showed that losses hurt us roughly twice as much as equal gains feel good. That pain makes us do strange things. We cling to losers because selling would make the loss "real." And we sell winners too early because locking in a gain feels wonderful.
Terrance Odean measured this in 10,000 brokerage accounts. Investors realized 14.8% of their available gains but only 9.8% of their available losses, meaning they sold winners about 50% more readily than losers. Worse, the winners they sold tended to keep outperforming the losers they held. They were pulling the flowers and watering the weeds.
Day traders show the same pattern. The Taiwan research found that many traders with long records of losses kept on trading at almost the same rate as profitable traders. Losses didn't teach them to stop. Losses made them want to try again.
The loop above is how a small loss becomes a catastrophic one. I wrote about this pattern in detail in The Revenge Trade: How a $50K Loss Quietly Becomes $200K. The short version: the market doesn't know or care what price you paid. Your purchase price is the most emotionally important number in your account and the least important number to your future.
The fresh-cash test: For every losing position, ask: "If I had this amount in cash today, would I buy this exact investment at today's price?" If the answer is no, your reason for holding it is emotional, not financial. For a calm framework, read Should You Sell at a Loss or Wait to Break Even? |
Sign 7: You Think You're the Exception
The final sign is the one that powers all the others: the quiet belief that the statistics apply to other people.
Every gambler at the craps table knows the house has an edge. They play anyway because tonight feels different. Every new trader has read that most traders lose. They start anyway because they're smarter, faster, more disciplined.
Overconfidence is measurable. In a study titled "Boys Will Be Boys," Barber and Odean found that men traded 45% more than women. That extra trading cut men's net returns by 2.65 percentage points a year, compared with 1.72 points for women. Confidence didn't produce better results. It produced more trades.
So here's a sobering question. If you believe you can beat the market, can you name your edge? Not a feeling. A specific, repeatable advantage that the professionals on the other side of your trade don't have.
Because those professionals mostly can't beat the market either. S&P Dow Jones Indices has tracked this for 25 years in its SPIVA scorecards. In 2025, 79% of actively managed U.S. large-cap funds trailed the S&P 500. Over 20 years, 92.9% did.
These are full-time teams with research budgets, data feeds and decades of training. Over the long run, more than nine out of ten of them lose to a simple index fund. If they can't reliably do it, the odds that an investor trading on a phone during lunch breaks will do it are vanishingly small.
Warren Buffett, arguably the greatest stock picker who ever lived, put money on this. In 2007 he bet that a low-cost S&P 500 index fund would beat a portfolio of hedge funds hand-picked by professionals over ten years. The index fund compounded at about 7.1% a year. The hedge fund selection managed about 2.2%. Buffett won, and the charity he chose collected more than $2 million.
The richest stock picker on earth bet on the index. That should tell you something. For more on why "safe" stock-picking often costs more than people realize, see Why Your "Safe" Stocks Are Actually Costing You Thousands.
The 2-Minute Self-Test: Are You Investing or Gambling?
Answer each question with a simple yes or no. Be honest. Nobody's watching.
Did you buy and sell the same stock within the last 30 days?
Do you own anything you couldn't explain in two sentences?
Do you hold penny stocks, meme stocks, crypto bets or options expiring within a month?
Are you using margin, leverage, CFDs, or money you'll need within five years?
Have you moved in or out of the market because of a headline in the last year?
Are you holding a losing position mainly to "get back to even"?
Do you believe you can consistently beat the market, without a written reason why?
Your score 0–1 "yes": You're investing. Protect that discipline. 2–3 "yes": You're drifting toward the casino. Fix the habits now, while it's cheap. 4 or more "yes": You're gambling. That's not a judgment of you as a person. It's a warning about where your money is heading. |
How to Stop Gambling and Start Investing: The 7-Step Reset
If you recognized yourself in this article, good. Recognition is the expensive part, and you've just done it for free. Here is how to turn a gamble into a real investment plan.
1. Stop the bleeding first
Before you change anything else, stop the behaviors that cause the biggest losses. Close leveraged positions you don't fully understand. Stop buying short-dated options. Stop opening new trades for 30 days. You can't rebuild a house while it's still on fire.
2. Separate your "investment money" from your "play money"
If you enjoy the thrill of trading, be honest about it and give it a strict budget. Many advisers suggest capping speculative money at around 5% of your portfolio, money you are fully prepared to lose. Keep it in a separate account. When it's gone, it's gone. Never top it up from your retirement savings.
3. Write a one-page investment plan
Write down your goal, your time horizon, what you'll buy, how much you'll add each month, and what you'll do when the market falls 20% or more. (The right answer is usually "nothing," or "keep buying.") A written plan is the single best defense against a 2 a.m. decision.
4. Own the haystack instead of hunting for the needle
Remember Bessembinder's research: a tiny group of stocks creates all the long-term gains, and no one can reliably find them in advance. A broad, low-cost index fund owns all of them automatically. You don't need to find the winners. You just need to own the whole field and let the winners carry you.
5. Automate, then get out of your own way
Set up an automatic monthly investment on the same day every month. Automation removes timing from the equation. You buy more when prices are low and less when they're high, without thinking about it.
6. Add friction to bad habits
Delete trading apps from your phone. Turn off price alerts. Check your portfolio once a quarter, not once an hour. Every barrier between an emotion and a trade saves you money.
7. Get help if it feels like a compulsion
If you can't stop trading even though it's hurting your finances, your sleep or your relationships, that's not a willpower problem. It may be gambling disorder, and it's treatable. Talk to a doctor or counselor, or contact a gambling helpline in your country. In the U.S., you can call or text 1-800-GAMBLER. There's no shame in it.
If you've already taken a big hit, you're not finished. My 12-month plan to rebuild your portfolio after a 50% loss shows you how to recover without taking bigger risks. And if you're worried about time, read You Lost Money in the Stock Market at 50. Is It Too Late to Retire Comfortably? The math is far kinder than most people expect.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the stock market just gambling?
No. The stock market itself is a place to own shares of real businesses that earn profits, and over long periods it has rewarded patient owners. It becomes gambling when you use it to make short-term bets, trade frequently, use leverage, or chase lottery-like payoffs. The market is the same; the behavior is different.
What is the difference between investing and gambling?
Investing is owning productive assets for years, on a plan, where the expected return after costs is positive. Gambling is betting on short-term outcomes where, after costs, the odds favor the house. Time horizon, costs and whether a plan or a feeling drives your decisions are the key differences.
Is day trading gambling?
For most people, the results look like it. In Brazil, 97% of people who day traded for more than 300 days lost money, and in Taiwan fewer than 1% of day traders could reliably profit after fees. A tiny skilled minority exists, but the odds for an ordinary person are similar to a casino's.
Are options trading and 0DTE options gambling?
Options can be used carefully to hedge risk, but buying short-dated options to chase big wins behaves like gambling. Research estimated retail options traders lost about $1.14 billion plus $4.13 billion in costs from late 2019 to mid-2021, and about $358,000 a day on same-day S&P 500 options.
Is buying an S&P 500 index fund gambling?
Not when held for the long term. You own a slice of about 500 large companies and their growing profits, at very low cost. The S&P 500 has never had a negative return over any rolling 20-year period, although it can fall sharply in any single year, so you should only invest money you can leave alone for years.
How much of my money can I use for speculation?
Many advisers suggest keeping speculative "play money" to around 5% of your portfolio, in a separate account, using only money you can afford to lose completely. Your core retirement money should follow a written, long-term plan.
What should I do if I think I'm addicted to trading?
Stop opening new trades, tell someone you trust, and get professional help. Compulsive trading can be a form of gambling disorder, which is treatable. In the U.S., you can call or text 1-800-GAMBLER; other countries have similar helplines.
The Bottom Line
The stock market will happily take your money in two very different ways.
It will take it as a casino: in commissions, spreads, bad timing, leverage, lottery tickets and revenge trades. In that game, the research is clear. The house wins, slowly and quietly, year after year.
Or it will take it as an owner's stake in the greatest collection of businesses ever assembled, and hand it back to you, larger, decades later. In that game, the strategy is so simple it almost feels like cheating: own the whole market, keep costs low, add money regularly, and leave it alone.
The seven signs aren't there to make you feel bad. They're there so you can see the casino walls clearly, and walk out the front door with your money still in your pocket.
FREE 38-PAGE REPORT: Lost Money in the Stock Market? It Probably Wasn't Your Fault. If this article opened your eyes, download my free report next. It goes deeper into why ordinary investors lose and what to do instead. Inside, you'll discover the seven Wall Street traps that quietly drain ordinary investors, how a "small" yearly fee can swallow $209,813 of a $100,000 nest egg, why 93% of professional fund managers lost to a simple index over 20 years, and the one boring strategy the industry hopes you never discover. It's written for investors over 40 who've been burned and want to know whether it's still possible to build real wealth for retirement. It is. Instant download. 100% free. No spam, ever. |
Sources
DALBAR, 2025 QAIB: Investors Missed the Best of 2024's Market Gains and 2026 QAIB press release
Barber, B. & Odean, T. (2000), Trading Is Hazardous to Your Wealth, Journal of Finance
Chague, F., De-Losso, R. & Giovannetti, B. (2020), Day Trading for a Living?
Barber, B., Lee, Y., Liu, Y. & Odean, T. (2014), The Cross-Section of Speculator Skill: Evidence from Day Trading, Journal of Financial Markets
Barber, B., Huang, X., Odean, T. & Schwarz, C., Attention-Induced Trading and Returns: Evidence from Robinhood Users, via UC Berkeley Haas
Kumar, A. (2009), Who Gambles in the Stock Market?, Journal of Finance, via UT Austin
Bessembinder, H. (2018), Do Stocks Outperform Treasury Bills?, via ASU W. P. Carey
Bryzgalova, S., Pavlova, A. & Sikorskaya, T., Retail Trading in Options and the Rise of the Big Three Wholesalers, as reported by Bloomberg
Beckmeyer, H., Branger, N. & Gayda, L., Retail Traders Love 0DTE Options... But Should They?, summary
European Securities and Markets Authority (2018), ESMA agrees to prohibit binary options and restrict CFDs
Baker, S. et al., Gambling Away Stability: Sports Betting's Impact on Vulnerable Households, NBER
J.P. Morgan Asset Management, 2025 Guide to Retirement and S&P 500 best-days analysis, 2006–2025
Morningstar, Mind the Gap 2026, as reported by WealthManagement.com
Odean, T. (1998), Are Investors Reluctant to Realize Their Losses?, Journal of Finance
S&P Dow Jones Indices, SPIVA U.S. Year-End 2025
Institutional Investor, Protégé Partners Pays Up in Buffett Bet
Disclaimer: This article is for general education only and is not personalized financial, tax or legal advice. Investing involves risk, including the loss of principal. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Hypothetical examples are illustrations, not predictions. Consider speaking with a licensed, fee-only financial adviser about your own situation.
Comments